T 1018/02 (Telecommunications System/BTG) of 9.12.2003

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2003:T101802.20031209
Date of decision: 09 December 2003
Case number: T 1018/02
Application number: 96202352.9
IPC class: H04Q 7/22
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: B
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 46 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: Telecommunications system
Applicant name: BRITISH TECHNOLOGY GROUP INTER-CORPORATE LICENSING LIMITED
Opponent name: Schlumberger Systèmes SA
SWISSCOM AG
GEMPLUS
BULL CP8
Landis & Gyr Communications Sàrl
GIESECKE & DEVRIENT GmbH
Board: 3.5.01
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 69(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 76(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 123(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 57a
European Patent Convention 1973 R 67
Keywords: Amendments - added subject-matter (yes)
Substantive procedural violation (no)
Catchwords:

Although a claim must not be interpreted in a way which is illogical or does not make any sense, the description cannot be used to give a different meaning to a claim feature which in itself imparts a clear credible technical teaching to the skilled reader. This also applies if the feature has not been initially disclosed in the form appearing in the claim (see point 3.8 of the Reasons).

Cited decisions:
G 0001/93
G 0001/99
T 0299/89
T 0528/93
T 0840/93
T 0407/02
Citing decisions:
R 0001/16
T 1054/00
T 0277/01
T 0373/01
T 0396/01
T 0880/01
T 1195/01
T 0386/04
T 1044/05
T 1121/05
T 0772/06
T 0843/06
T 1772/06
T 1202/07
T 1395/07
T 1519/08
T 1188/09
T 0369/10
T 0698/12
T 1597/12
T 2156/12
T 2346/12
T 2359/12
T 2592/12
T 0666/13
T 0298/14
T 1249/14
T 1517/14
T 1726/15
T 2350/15
T 2376/15
T 0043/16
T 1127/16
T 2294/16
T 2628/16
T 0030/17
T 0879/18

24 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application

Case Law Book: V Priority

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

General Case Law