GL E IV 1.11.2 Procedure

It is for the competent division to decide whether to take evidence by way of inspection of a model. If it considers this to be necessary, it must take a decision in the form of an order to take evidence (see E‑IV, 1.4), setting out the relevant facts to be proved as well as the date, time and place of the inspection.
Where possible, the inspection is to be carried out on the premises of the EPO.

GL E IV 1.11.1 When may models be submitted?

The EPC makes no express provision for the submission of models, but there is nothing to stop a party from submitting one himself. Models are not part of the application or patent, and therefore cannot be used to disclose the invention (Art. 83).
Models may be useful in EPO proceedings if they serve to substantiate the patentability of an invention, e.g. by showing that a given device actually works or does so particularly advantageously.

GL E IV 1.10.1 Expenses for travel and subsistence

Witnesses and experts who are summoned by and appear before the EPO are entitled to appropriate reimbursement, by the EPO, of expenses for travel and subsistence (see E‑IV, 1.10.3). This applies equally to witnesses and experts who are summoned by and appear before the EPO in the course of oral proceedings held by videoconference for travel to the place where they make themselves available to appear before the EPO by videoconference (e.g.

GL E IV 1.8.2 Objection to an expert

The parties may object to an expert. Therefore, before commissioning an expert to make an opinion, the competent department informs the parties of the expert whom it intends to ask to draw up an opinion and of the subject-matter of the opinion. The communication to the parties states a time limit within which objections to the expert may be made. If the parties do object to an expert, the competent department will decide on the objection.[Rule 121(4); ]

Pages

Subscribe to XEPC: EPC and PCT resource RSS