GL E IV 2.3 Competence

The decision on the request and any resulting taking of evidence are incumbent upon the department of the EPO required to take the decision liable to be affected by the facts to be established.[Rule 123(4); ]
Responsibility for the decision and the taking of evidence will therefore normally rest with:
(i)the examining division, from the date of filing until the date

GL E IV 2.1 Requirements

On request, the EPO may, without delay, hear oral evidence or conduct inspections, with a view to conserving evidence of facts liable to affect a decision, where there is reason to fear that it might subsequently become more difficult or even impossible to take evidence. This could for example be the case where an important witness is about to emigrate to a distant country or where perishable matter, e.g. a food-stuff, is adduced as involving a use made accessible to the public.[Rule 123(1); ]

GL E IV 1.12 Video recordings

A party to the proceedings may request that a video recording be shown at the oral proceedings. Such a request must include the recording as such as well as specifying the type of equipment needed.
If video recordings are submitted, the division decides whether showing them will assist the proceedings. Video data carriers are always kept if the division has looked at them.

GL E IV 1.11.3 Keeping the model

Even if the division does inspect the model, the EPO is not obliged to keep it. It is for the division to decide whether a model is to be kept by the EPO. However, as a general rule, models which would require special precautions or security measures if kept in the EPO are returned to the party.
The formalities officer is responsible for implementing the decision to keep or return the model. If the model is to be kept, the formalities officer notes this on a label on the file.

Pages

Subscribe to XEPC: EPC and PCT resource RSS