| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1992:T010891.19920917 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 17 September 1992 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0108/91 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 81107429.3 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B65D 41/18 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | A | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Sears | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Sears, Roebuck Djikstra Plastics Saier |
||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | The amendment of a granted claim to replace an inaccurate technical statement, which is evidently inconsistent with the totality of the disclosure of the patent, by an accurate statement of the technical features involved, does not infringe Article 123(3) EPC. (Decisions T 371/88, OJ EPO 1992, 157; T 231/89, OJ EPO 1993,013 and T 938/90, unpublished, considered). | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Amendment of granted claim to remove inconsistency with totality of disclosure (allowed) Inventive step (no) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: | |||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t910108ex1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
21 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)