| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1992:T070289.19920326 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 26 March 1992 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0702/89 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 85109138.9 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B60T 8/28 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | A | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Allied Signal | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Teves | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | A request for re-establishment of rights by an Opponent who has failed to observe the time limit under Article 99(1) EPC for filing the notice of opposition and paying the appropriate fee must be rejected as inadmissible. | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Extension of time limits (no) General interruption or subseuqent dislocation in the delivery of mail Admissibility of a request for restitutio in integrum (no) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t890702ex1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
7 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)