| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1990:T071689.19900222 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 22 February 1990 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0716/89 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 85303946.9 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C12Q 1/14 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | A | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Unilever | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Unilever | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.02 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | The principle, that parties have a right to be heard in accordance with due process of law requires that under Rule 57(1) EPC an opposition must be communicated to the patent proprietor before a decision is taken to revoke the patent, even where the proprietor is himself the opponent. | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Right to be heard in opposition proceedings Opponent being the proprietor Communication of opposition to proprietor |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t890716ex1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
5 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)
