European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1990:T027589.19900503 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 03 May 1990 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0275/89 | ||||||||
Application number: | 85100650.2 | ||||||||
IPC class: | F28F 21/98 F28D 1/053 |
||||||||
Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
Distribution: | |||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | - | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Klostermann | ||||||||
Opponent name: | Buderus | ||||||||
Board: | 3.2.01 | ||||||||
Headnote: | 1. If postponement of oral proceedings is requested, the fact that, according to a professional representative, the represented party (in this case the patent proprietor) is suffering from acute illness and that his participation in the proceedings is necessary, is not in itself sufficient reason - at least without further particulars concerning the circumstances which make it necessary for the represented party to participate in the proceedings - for adjourning the proceedings. 2. The provisions of Article 101(2) EPC and Rule 58(3) EPC cannot be interpreted as meaning that the Opposition Division is obliged in every case to issue at least one communication. |
||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
Keywords: | Request to adjourn oral proceedings (rejected) Reimbursement of appeal fee (rejected) |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t890275ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
25 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)
Case Law Book: III Amendments
Case Law Book: IV Divisional Applications
XCLR IV C 6.4 EPO communication concerning submissions by the other party – adequate opportunity to reply