T 0275/89 (Steel radiators) of 3.5.1990

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1990:T027589.19900503
Date of decision: 03 May 1990
Case number: T 0275/89
Application number: 85100650.2
IPC class: F28F 21/98
F28D 1/053
Language of proceedings: DE
Distribution:
Download and more information:
No PDF available
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: DE | EN | FR
Versions: OJ
Title of application: -
Applicant name: Klostermann
Opponent name: Buderus
Board: 3.2.01
Headnote: 1. If postponement of oral proceedings is requested, the fact that, according to a professional representative, the represented party (in this case the patent proprietor) is suffering from acute illness and that his participation in the proceedings is necessary, is not in itself sufficient reason - at least without further particulars concerning the circumstances which make it necessary for the represented party to participate in the proceedings - for adjourning the proceedings.
2. The provisions of Article 101(2) EPC and Rule 58(3) EPC cannot be interpreted as meaning that the Opposition Division is obliged in every case to issue at least one communication.
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 113(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 101(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 56
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 104
European Patent Convention 1973 R 58(3)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 67
Keywords: Request to adjourn oral proceedings (rejected)
Reimbursement of appeal fee (rejected)
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
-
Citing decisions:
T 0682/89
T 0532/91
T 0787/91
T 0263/93
T 0494/95
T 0582/95
T 0881/95
T 0528/96
T 0037/97
T 0392/97
T 0774/97
T 0914/98
T 1056/98
T 0642/99
T 0129/01
T 1212/04
T 0601/06
T 1923/06
T 0273/07
T 0176/08
T 2086/10
T 1152/14

25 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: III Amendments

Case Law Book: IV Divisional Applications

General Case Law