T 0010/82 (Opposition; admissibility) of 15.3.1983

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1983:T001082.19830315
Date of decision: 15 March 1983
Case number: T 0010/82
Application number: 78100803.2
IPC class: -
Language of proceedings: DE
Distribution:
Download and more information:
No PDF available
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: DE | EN | FR
Versions: OJ
Title of application: -
Applicant name: Bayer
Opponent name: -
Board: 3.3.01
Headnote: I. If a professional representative files notice of opposition in his own name although - as he later allows - he is acting in a professional capacity on behalf of a client, the notice does not comply with Rule 55 EPC.
II. The question whether in such a case the deficiencies in the notice of opposition can be remedied in accordance with Rule 56(2) EPC, even after a considerable lapse of time, has not been determined. III.If a party to proceedings communicates to the Board shortly before the oral proceedings facts that are significant to its decision and which would have rendered oral proceedings unnecessary, it may be equitable to require him to pay the costs incurred by the other party as a result of the oral proceedings.
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 99(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 104(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 106(3)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 55
European Patent Convention 1973 R 56(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 56(2)
Keywords: Cost apportionment
Admissibility of opposition
Interlocutory decision
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
-
Citing decisions:
G 0001/84
G 0003/97
G 0004/97
T 0582/90
T 0886/91
T 0649/92
T 0798/93
T 1022/93
T 0590/94
T 0301/95
T 0052/96
T 1178/04

18 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: III Amendments

Case Law Book: IV Divisional Applications

Case Law Book: V Priority

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

General Case Law