| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2016:T172712.20160201 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 01 February 2016 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1727/12 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 06076929.6 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B41J 33/36 B41J 33/54 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Tape drive and printing apparatus | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Videojet Technologies, Inc. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Markem-Imaje Limited | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.05 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | "Biogen sufficiency" (Biogen Inc. v Medeva plc [1996] UKHL 18) Sufficiency of disclosure (yes) - burden of proof (see reasons 1.1) - in the whole claimed range (see reasons 1.5) Remittal to the opposition division |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
see point 1.1 and 1.5 of the reasons |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t121727eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021