European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2015:T059511.20150527 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 27 May 2015 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0595/11 | ||||||||
Application number: | 05075618.8 | ||||||||
IPC class: | A01J 7/02 A01J 5/08 |
||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | C | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | A method of milking a dairy animal | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Lely Enterprises AG | ||||||||
Opponent name: | DeLaval International AB | ||||||||
Board: | 3.2.04 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
Keywords: | Recognition of legitimate expectations (yes) Appeal deemed to have been filed and admissible (yes) Sufficiency of disclosure - claim 1 of the main request (yes) Novelty - claim 1 of the main request (yes) Remittal to the first instance for further prosecution |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
1. When deciding on the possible consequences of the Office's failure to meet its obligation to check a fee payment, the merely conjectural possibility of a real, but otherwise in itself not necessarily decisive setback (here the non-occurrence of an immediate success) for a party is more preferable than a certain decisive loss of all rights for another party, in particular when for a long time none of the parties expected the latter, see Reasons 1.13 2. Fee payment is not an issue of admissibility of the appeal, but rather a precondition for the very existence of the appeal, i.e. its deemed filing, see Reasons 1.15 |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t110595eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021