| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2014:T110010.20140318 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 18 March 2014 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1100/10 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 95912559.2 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C12N 15/57 C12N 9/52 C12N 9/54 C12N 9/56 C11D 3/386 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | IMPROVED ENZYMES AND DETERGENTS CONTAINING THEM | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | BASF SE | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Novozymes A/S Danisco US Inc. |
||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.08 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of the Main Request and of Auxiliary Requests 1 and 2 (no); Admissibility of Auxiliary Request 3 (yes); Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (no); Auxiliary Request 3 - requirements of the EPC (yes); |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
Although the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA) are drafted and adopted by the Presidium, it is the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation which decides to approve the RPBA. Only thereby the RPBA enter into force to be applied by the Boards of Appeal (cf. points (9) to (14) of the Reasons for the Decision). |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t101100eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021