European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2006:T101203.20061201 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 01 December 2006 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 1012/03 | ||||||||
Application number: | 97402171.9 | ||||||||
IPC class: | C06B 31/28 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | B | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | Porous prilled ammonium nitrate | ||||||||
Applicant name: | SASOL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.3.05 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
Keywords: | Competence of the so-called Technical Board of Appeals (yes) Appeal restricted to specific points of law (no) Request for having oral proceedings in Munich instead of The Hague not allowable Summons to oral proceedings in The Hague does not violate Article 113(1) EPC |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
1. Article 6(2) EPC does not provide a legal basis entitling an applicant who has been summoned to oral proceedings in The Hague to request the oral proceedings to be held in Munich. 2. Article 116(1) EPC in conjunction with Article 10(1)(2)(a)(b) EPC provides a legal basis for an applicant to be summoned to oral proceedings before the Examining Division at the Hague. |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t031012eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021