| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2011:T128910.20110413 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 13 April 2011 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1289/10 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 04753910.1 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G06F 1/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Secure user access subsystem for use in a computer information database system | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Belarc, Inc., et al. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.5.06 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Request for re-establishment of rights - not allowable Exercise of all due care on the part of the European representative when providing a contact email address - no |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
If a European representative provides a contact email address for mail that may require immediate action by the representative, then a mail check at the end of the business day, including the quarantine area of the email system, is essential. |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t101289eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
23 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPC Articles
EPC Implementing Rules
Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO 2014, A84 - Interlocutory decision of Technical Board of Appeal 3.2.06 dated 20 February 2014
XOJ EPO 2014, A76 - Interlocutory decision of Technical Board of Appeal 3.5.06 dated 24 February 2014
Case Law Book: III Amendments
XCLR III E 5.5.2.A Communication between professional representatives and their clients, the EPO or other representatives