| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2013:T134010.20130522 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 22 May 2013 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1340/10 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 01981411.0 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C09K 3/14 B24D 3/00 C04B 35/10 B24D 11/02 B24D 3/02 B24D 3/04 B24D 3/28 B24D 3/34 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | D | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | CERAMIC AGGREGATE PARTICLES | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | 3M Innovative Properties Company | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Center for Abrasives & Refractories SaintÂGobain Abrasives, Inc. |
||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.05 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Substantial procedural violation (yes): lack of substantiation of one of the grounds for opposition; decision invalidated Remittal (no) - length of the proceedings Inventive step (main and auxiliary requests): no - obvious combination of features known from a prior art document |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t101340eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021