European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1990:T001888.19900125 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 25 January 1990 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0018/88 | ||||||||
Application number: | 83303322.8 | ||||||||
IPC class: | C07F 9/65 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | A | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | - | ||||||||
Applicant name: | DOW | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.3.02 | ||||||||
Headnote: | The superior effect of subsequent products which are neither novel nor inventive is not sufficient to make the intermediates inventive (cf. point 8 of the reasons). | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Inventive step (no) Intermediates |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t880018ex1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
6 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)