European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1991:T002288.19911122 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 22 November 1991 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0022/88 | ||||||||
Application number: | 79301340.0 | ||||||||
IPC class: | H01Q 1/38 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | A | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | - | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Secretary of State | ||||||||
Opponent name: | Siemens | ||||||||
Board: | 3.5.01 | ||||||||
Headnote: | A written statement setting out the grounds of appeal within the meaning of Article 108, third sentence, EPC, must contain reasons why the decision under appeal should be set aside. A written statement announcing only that the appellant will complete an omitted act, in this case the filing of the translations of the revised claims, within the four-month period allowed for submitting the grounds of appeal, does not comprise such reasons and therefore does not constitute a valid statement of the grounds of appeal. | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Grounds for appeal - inadequate content Inadmissibility of appeal |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t880022ex1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
4 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)