T 0298/97 (Detergent compositions/UNILEVER) of 28.5.2001

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2001:T029897.20010528
Date of decision: 28 May 2001
Case number: T 0298/97
Application number: 89304210.1
IPC class: C11D 11/00
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: A
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 60 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: OJ | Published
Title of application: Detergent compositions and process for preparing them
Applicant name: UNILEVER PLC, et al
Opponent name: NV PROCTER & GAMBLE EUROPEAN TECHNICAL CENTER SA
Board: 3.3.06
Headnote: 1. If the Notice of Appeal is filed by an adversely affected party but the Grounds of Appeal are filed by a (natural or legal) person who, although having economic connections with that adversely affected party, is not itself that party, the appeal cannot be held admissible. (See reasons, points 3.2 and 3.3)
2. No provision having been made in the Implementing Regulations pursuant to Article 133(3) EPC, last sentence, the EPC does not currently allow the representation of one legal person by the employee of another economically related legal person. (See reasons, point 4)
3. Save in the limited situation of a transfer of the right to oppose a European patent (or to appeal or continue an opposition appeal) together with the related business assets of the opponent's business, a commercial interest in revocation of such patent is not a requirement for being an opponent. Nor is possession of such a commercial interest sufficient to allow a successor in business to take over and conduct opposition or opposition appeal proceedings in the absence of evidence of a transfer of the right to do so together with the related business assets of the opponent. (See reasons, point 12.2)
4. (a) In the absence of such evidence, the transfer of an opponent's business assets to two separate persons cannot give either of them the right to take over and conduct opposition or opposition appeal proceedings. (See reasons, point 7.6)
(b) When such evidence is present, only the transferee established by such evidence can acquire such a right. (See reasons, point 7.6)
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 99
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 107
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 108
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 110
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 113
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 116
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 133
European Patent Convention 1973 R 64
European Patent Convention 1973 R 65
Keywords: Admissibility of appeal (no)
Party adversely affected not the party filing Grounds of Appeal
Commercial interest insufficient to remedy deficiency in admissibility
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
G 0004/88
T 0547/88
T 0563/89
T 0659/92
Citing decisions:
G 0002/04
T 0454/98
T 0590/98
T 0711/99
T 0074/00
T 0424/02
T 1091/02
T 0085/03
T 0956/03
T 1178/04
T 1421/05
T 0875/06
T 2308/10
T 0423/11
T 0545/12
T 1775/12
T 2357/12
T 1137/13
T 0941/16

27 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: III Amendments

Case Law Book: V Priority

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

General Case Law