| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1999:T014495.19990226 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 26 February 1999 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0144/95 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 88301755.0 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | A47L 15/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Machine dishwashing process | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Unilever N.V. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien Chemische Fabrik Dr. Weigert (GmbH & Co.) Epenhuysen Chemie N.V. (Intervener) |
||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.04 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Intervention (section 2) - inadmissible - no remittal to first instance - no right or obligation to pay appeal fee (reimbursed) Intervener's professional representative also authorised for an appellant - no abuse (section 2.9) Taking of evidence Public prior use - distinction between machine and process used thereby (section 5.3) Theoretical possibility of access to information - source of information must first be identified (section 5.3) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t950144eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021