| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1997:T011495.19970408 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 08 April 1997 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0114/95 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 88101117.5 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B60T 8/32 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Anti-lock control method for vehicle | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | HONDA GIKEN KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | WABCO Standard GmbH Robert Bosch GmbH |
||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of the opposition (yes) Form of appeal: admissible (yes) Main request: inventive step (yes) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
If an opponent requests revocation of the patent in its entirety, it is sufficient to substantiate the ground(s) of opposition in respect of at least one claim of the patent for the requirements of Rule 55(c) EPC to be met (reasons 1.4, see also T 926/93). |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t950114eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021