| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1991:T015490.19911219 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 19 December 1991 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0154/90 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 84308814.7 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B65B 69/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | A | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | De la Rue Sytems | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | GAO | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.04 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | 1. If the appeal relating to the revocation of a patent is rejected as inadmissible and there is no other admissible request, an appeal relating to apportionment of costs is inadmissible, it being the sole subject of an appeal (Article 106(4) EPC). 2. If, however, the impugned decision did not take into account the withdrawal of the request for oral proceedings and was, therefore, based on a substantial procedural violation, the part of the impugned decision relating to apportionment of costs is to be set aside. |
||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of appeal Withdrawal of request for oral proceedings - in time Apportionment of costs |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t900154ex1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
10 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)
Case Law Book: III Amendments
XCLR III R 2.2.2 Request for scheduling or postponement of oral proceedings; withdrawal of request for oral proceedings