| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2001:T087598.20011026 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 26 October 2001 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0875/98 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 86906668.8 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C08F 220/02 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Rubbery acrylic polymer, latex and preparation thereof | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | The B.F. GOODRICH Company | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.03 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of appeal (yes) - no undue burden Inventive step (no) - obvious modification Procedural violation (no) - no obligation to apply 'case law' |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
A single decision issued by an opposition division does not establish a "case law" which must be adhered to in another opposition case even if the subject-matter of the two respective cases is closely related (Reasons 4). |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t980875eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021