| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1990:T004790.19900220 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 20 February 1990 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0047/90 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 84303578.3 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C07C 125/067 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | A | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Sumitomo | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | An appeal may be considered as well founded for the purpose of Article 109(1) EPC if an appellant no longer seeks grant of the patent with text as refused by the Examining Division, but proposes substantial amendments to the text which are clearly intended to overcome the objections raised in the decision under appeal (following Decision T 139/87 - 3.2.1 "Governor valve/BENDIX", OJ EPO 1990, 68). | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Claims substantially amended on appeal to meet decisions of refusal by Examining Division Remittal Interlocutory revision |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: | |||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t900047ex1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
28 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPO Guidelines - E General Procedural Matters
Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)