European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1991:T003090.19910613 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 13 June 1991 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0030/90 | ||||||||
Application number: | 79300552.1 | ||||||||
IPC class: | C08B 31/12 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | |||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | Preparation of a cationic starch paste | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Grain Processing Corporation | ||||||||
Opponent name: | CPC Europe Ltd. | ||||||||
Board: | 3.3.03 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Re-establishment of rights by Appellant into time limit for filing Notice of Appeal : denied Appeal consequently inadmissible |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t900030eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
22 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPO Guidelines - E General Procedural Matters
Case Law Book: III Amendments
XCLR III E 5.4.2 A system operating efficiently for many years as evidence that it is normally satisfactory