| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1986:T009484.19860620 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 20 June 1986 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0094/84 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 79400579.3 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C09D 3/70 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | FR | ||||||||
| Distribution: | |||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | DUCO | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | The right to be heard in accordance with the principle of due hearing enshrined in Article 113(1) EPC guarantees that grounds put forward are taken into consideration. That principle is contravened if a translation, subsequently filed in an official language, of a Japanese document cited in due time is disallowed. | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Inventive step Obvious alternative Reimbursement of the fee for appeal Non-consideration of the grounds put forward by the opponent |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t840094ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
19 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)