| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2017:T240616.20170921 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 21 September 2017 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 2406/16 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 08741914.9 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B01L 3/00 F16K 99/00 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | DEVICE FOR HANDLING LIQUID SAMPLES | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Amic AB | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.05 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Re-establishment of rights - (no) Re-establishment of rights - isolated mistake within a satisfactory system for monitoring time limits (no) Re-establishment of rights - due care in dealing with assistants (no) Appeal fee not paid - appeal deemed not to have been filed |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
It now seems to be settled case law of the Boards of Appeal that an appeal where the appeal fee is paid after the two-month time limit of Article 108, first sentence, has expired is deemed not to have been filed (see grounds 4 to 4.2). |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t162406eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021