| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1992:J000690.19921022 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 22 October 1992 | ||||||||
| Case number: | J 0006/90 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 84903728.8 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B65D 25/08 B65D 81/32 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | A | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Baxter | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.1.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | To make a valid request for re-establishment of rights within the year immediately following the expiry of the unobserved time limit, it is sufficient if the files contain a clearly documented statement of intent from which any third party may infer that the applicant is endeavouring to maintain the patent application. | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Restitutio - time limit for filing application - one year | ||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/j900006ex1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
13 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)