European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1991:J001490.19910321 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 21 March 1991 | ||||||||
Case number: | J 0014/90 | ||||||||
Application number: | 89250127.1 | ||||||||
IPC class: | - | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
Distribution: | |||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | - | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Flachglas | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.1.01 | ||||||||
Headnote: | 1. Re-dating an application cannot be justified on the grounds that the later date would permit the granting of a European patent for a new Contracting State. 2. An invitation to the President of the EPO under Article 12a of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal to comment on "questions of general interest" which arise in the course of proceedings is made to him direct. It is not necessary for such questions to be specifically defined or formulated (see Reasons, point 1). |
||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Date of filing - Re-dating to obtain patent protection in a new Contracting State (no) | ||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/j900014ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
4 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)