| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1984:J001283.19841109 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 09 November 1984 | ||||||||
| Case number: | J 0012/83 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 81104560.8 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | - | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | A | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Chugai Seiyaku | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.1.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | 1. An applicant for a European patent may be "adversely affected" within the meaning of Article 107 EPC by a decision to grant the patent, if it is granted with a text not approved by the applicant in accordance with Article 97(2)(a) and Rule 51(4) EPC. 2. For a European patent to be granted, no positive approval of the text by the applicant is required. For examination to be resumed in accordance with the last sentence of Rule 51(4) EPC, disapproval must actually be communicated. |
||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Inadmissible appeal Appeal/inadmissible Party adversely affected |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/j830012ex1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
10 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)