| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2002:T096100.20021209 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 09 December 2002 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0961/00 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 96902742.4 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C01B 33/143 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Novel temperature-activated polysilicic acids and their use in paper production processes | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | J.M. HUBER CORPORATION | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Eka Chemicals AB | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.05 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Revocation of patent after declaration according to Legal Advice 11/82 - adverse effect of decision - no Admissibility of appeal by proprietor - no Referral to Enlarged Board - no |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
A patent proprietor who has declared in opposition proceedings before the opposition division that he withdraws his consent to the granted version of his European patent and will not file an amended version (see also Legal Advice 11/82), is not adversely affected within the meaning of Article 107, first sentence, EPC by the decision of the opposition division revoking the European patent. |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t000961eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021