| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2000:T054296.20000511 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 11 May 2000 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0542/96 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 90201676.5 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | A61K 7/18 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Dental remineralization | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Colgate-Palmolive Company | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | The Procter & Gamble Company | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.02 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Novelty: (yes) - Remineralisation of teeth as novel therapeutic application Inventive step: (no) - synergistic effect irrelevant to the assessment of the inventive step of a composition, which is clearly suggested in the prior art Grounds of opposition in appeal proceedings |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t960542eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021