| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2003:T069200.20030513 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 13 May 2003 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0692/00 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 93850110.3 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | D21H 23/58 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Coating device for the coating of a size-press roll, paper, or board | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | VALMET CORPORATION | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Voith Sulzer Papiermachinen GmbH | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.06 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | All requests: Admissibility of amendments - yes; ambiguity not created by amendments Main request and first auxiliary request: Novelty - no Second and third auxiliary request: Inventive step - no; reformulation of the technical problem to be solved in view of the closest prior art; solution - obvious to try Oral proceedings: attendance - announcement of a party (having requested oral proceedings) shortly before the appointed date that it may or may not attend oral proceedings amounts to an abuse of procedure |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t000692eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021