Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).

R 0013/10 () of 24.3.2011

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2011:R001310.20110324

Date of decision:

24 March 2011

Case number:

R 0013/10

Petition for review of:

Application number:

IPC class:

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

B

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 23Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

Method for applying articles to a carton surface

Applicant name:

ELOPAK SYSTEMS AG

Opponent name:

SIG Technology AG

Board:

EBA

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(c)
European Patent Convention Art 113
European Patent Convention R 106
European Patent Convention R 107
European Patent Convention R 109(2)(a)
European Patent Convention R 109(3)

Keywords:

-

Catchwords:

Petition for review clearly unallowable.

Cited decisions:

R 0001/08
R 0022/10

Citing decisions:

-

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r100013eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

8 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

X A.112a EPC Article 112a Petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal

X A.113 EPC Right to be heard and basis of decisions

EPC Implementing Rules

X R.106 EPC Obligation to raise objections

X R.107 EPC Contents of the petition for review

X R.109 EPC Procedure in dealing with petitions for review

Case Law Book: V Priority

X CLR V B 3.4.3 No suspensory effect – review of substantive law excluded

General Case Law

X R 0001/08 () of 15.7.2008

X R 0022/10 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/ZALTRON) of 7.3.2011