Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).

The Enlarged Board of Appeal is responsible for proceedings under Art. 112 EPC (referral of points of law by boards of appeal or the President of the EPO), proceedings under Art. 112a EPC (petitions for review against decisions of the boards of appeal) and proceedings under Art. 23(1), first sentence, EPC (removal from office of a member of the boards of appeal).

CLR V B Proceedings before the Enlarged Board of Appeal

Introduction

CLR V A 9.8.2 Withdrawal of appeal under Rule 103(2) EPC

CLR V A 9.8.1 Withdrawal of appeal under Rule 103(1)(b) EPC

CLR V A 9.8 Withdrawal of appeal

9.8.1 Withdrawal of appeal under Rule 103(1)(b) EPC

9.8.2 Withdrawal of appeal under Rule 103(2) EPC

CLR V A 9.7.3 Violation of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations

CLR V A 9.7.2.B Reimbursement held to be equitable

CLR V A 9.7.2.A Reimbursement held not to be equitable

In J 22/85 (OJ 1987, 455) the board did not consider a reimbursement of the appeal fee to be justified because the appellant had failed to provide the Receiving Section with the evidence subsequently submitted in the appeal proceedings.

CLR V A 9.7.2 Conduct of appellant

The conduct of the appellant may render the reimbursement of the appeal fee not equitable even if a substantial procedural violation occurred (J 4/09; see also T 1500/10).

CLR V B 2 Referral under Article 112 EPC

CLR V B 1 Introduction