GL A VIII 1.8 Invitation to file authorisation and legal consequence in case of non-compliance

Where the appointment of a legal practitioner entitled to act as professional representative in accordance with Art. 134(8), or an employee acting for an applicant in accordance with Art. 133(3), first sentence, but who is not a professional representative, is communicated to the EPO without an authorisation being filed, the representative is invited to file the authorisation within a two-month period specified by the EPO (see E‑VIII, 1.6).

GL A VIII 1.5 Representation by a legal practitioner

Representation in proceedings under the EPC may also be undertaken in the same way as by a professional representative (see A-VIII, 1.2) by any legal practitioner qualified in one of the contracting states and having their place of business within such state, to the extent that they are entitled, within the said state, to act as a professional representative in patent matters.

GL A VIII 1.4 Common representative

Joint applicants, joint proprietors of patents and more than one person giving joint notice of opposition or intervention may act through a common representative. If the request for the grant of a European patent, the notice of opposition or the request for intervention does not name a common representative, the party first named in the relevant document will be considered to be the common representative. The common representative can thus be a legal person.

Pages

Subscribe to XEPC: EPC and PCT resource RSS