T 0035/99 (Pericardial access/GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY) of 29.9.1999

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1999:T003599.19990929
Date of decision: 29 September 1999
Case number: T 0035/99
Application number: 92923107.4
IPC class: A61M 31/00
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: A
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 25 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: OJ | Published
Title of application: Pericardial access via the right auricle
Applicant name: Georgetown University
Opponent name: -
Board: 3.2.02
Headnote: In contrast to procedures whose end result is the death of the living being "under treatment", either deliberately or incidentally (eg the slaughter of animals or methods for measuring biological functions of an animal which comprise the sacrificing of said animal, cf. T 182/90), those physical interventions on the human or animal body which, whatever their specific purpose, give priority to maintaining the life or health of the body on which they are performed, are "in their nature" methods for treatment by surgery within the meaning of Article 52(4) EPC.
The terms "treatment" and "surgery" in Article 52(4) EPC cannot be considered as constituting two distinct requirements for the exclusion provided therein. The exclusion encompasses any surgical activity, irrespective of whether it is carried out alone or in combination with other medical or non-medical measures.
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 52(4)
Keywords: Method for treatment of the human body by surgery (yes)
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
G 0005/83
T 0116/85
T 0182/90
T 0820/92
T 0082/93
T 0329/94
Citing decisions:
G 0001/07
T 0775/97
T 1005/98
T 0964/99
T 0383/03
T 0992/03
T 0005/04
T 1262/04
T 0170/07
T 1695/07

17 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: I Patentability

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

General Case Law