| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1997:T046395.19970129 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 29 January 1997 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0463/95 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 82111126.7 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | H03F 3/217 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Amplitude modulator | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | HARRIS CORPORATION | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | O1: ABB Management AG O2: Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft |
||||||||
| Board: | 3.5.02 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | New claim filed in opposition proceedings one week before oral proceedings - scope restricting combination of features taken from claims which had been opposed - claim admissible Inventive step - yes, after amendment Non prepublished documents filed late during the appeal proceedings as circumstantial evidence - not admissible Prior art which had been referred to in connection with a novelty objection which no longer applied, and then not further pursued, until oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal - not relevant - inadmissible |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t950463eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021