| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1995:T063194.19950328 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 28 March 1995 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0631/94 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 89100553.0 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B22C 13/06 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
| Distribution: | |||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | WAGNER SINTO | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Künkel-Wagner (Intervener) | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.05 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | When a decision to terminate opposition proceedings, taken in written proceedings, is handed over to the EPO postal service, it becomes public and effective and has therefore been issued. If the parties to the proceedings do not appeal, the opposition proceedings are completed at that point in time and thereafter intervention based on Article 105 EPC is no longer possible. | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Intervention of the assumed infringer - inadmissible Beitritt des vermeintlichen Patentverletzers - unzulässig |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t940631ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
8 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)