European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1992:T071591.19920324 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 24 March 1992 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0715/91 | ||||||||
Application number: | 86100040.4 | ||||||||
IPC class: | G06F 9/44 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | |||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | Modification of device configuration by user | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Intern. Business Machines Corp | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.5.01 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | All due care (no) - responsibility for technically qualified assistant |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t910715eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
16 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Case Law Book: III Amendments
XCLR III E 5.4.2 A system operating efficiently for many years as evidence that it is normally satisfactory