European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1992:T006091.19921005 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 05 October 1992 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0060/91 | ||||||||
Decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal: | G 0009/92, G 0009/92 | ||||||||
Application number: | 86111866.9 | ||||||||
IPC class: | B62D 65/00 B62M 3/08 |
||||||||
Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
Distribution: | |||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | - | ||||||||
Applicant name: | BMW AG | ||||||||
Opponent name: | KUKA | ||||||||
Board: | 3.2.01 | ||||||||
Headnote: | The following point of law, in two parts, is referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal: I. Can the Board of Appeal amend a contested decision to the appellant's disadvantage? II. If so, to what extent? |
||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Possibility of altering a contested decision to the appellant's disadvantage Referral to Enlarged Board of Appeal |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t910060ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
11 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)