T 0324/90 (Re-establishment) of 13.3.1991

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1991:T032490.19910313
Date of decision: 13 March 1991
Case number: T 0324/90
Application number: 83109035.2
IPC class: C08L 81/02
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: A
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 498 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: OJ | Published
Title of application: -
Applicant name: Phillips Petroleum
Opponent name: Hoechst
Board: 3.3.03
Headnote: In order to comply with the two-months' time limit laid down in Article 122(2) EPC, it is not necessary that the application for re-establishment of rights provide any prima facie evidence for the facts set out in it, nor is it necessary that it indicate the means by which those facts are supported (e.g. medical certificates, sworn statements and the like). Such evidence may be submitted after the time limit, if so required.
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 108
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 122
Keywords: Re-establishment of rights
Prima facie evidence
All due care (no)
Unsatisfactory system
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
-
Citing decisions:
J 0008/95
J 0037/97
J 0011/09
J 0012/09
J 0013/09
J 0014/09
J 0005/11
J 0006/11
T 0516/91
T 0239/92
T 0667/92
T 0682/92
T 0488/93
T 0878/95
T 0148/96
T 0301/96
T 0690/98
T 0543/99
T 0511/02
T 0902/05
T 1401/05
T 1130/06
T 0257/07
T 0261/07
T 1042/07
T 1764/08
T 1553/13

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t900324ex1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

25 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: III Amendments

Case Law Book: V Priority

General Case Law