| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1992:T038689.19920324 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 24 March 1992 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0386/89 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 80303122.8 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B60B 23/12 B60B 35/10 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | |||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Wheels manually adjustable for varying track | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | GKN Sankey Limited | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | 01 Lemmerz-Werke KGaA 02 Levypyörä OY |
||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Inventive step - reformulation of problem Inventive step - skilled person |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
The alleged effect of a described feature cannot be taken into account when determining the problem underlying the invention for the purpose of assessing inventive step, if it cannot be deduced by the skilled person from the application as filed considered in relation to the nearest prior art. |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: | |||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t890386eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021