European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1990:T029388.19900323 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 23 March 1990 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0293/88 | ||||||||
Application number: | 81304745.3 | ||||||||
IPC class: | - | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | A | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | - | ||||||||
Applicant name: | DAN-PAL | ||||||||
Opponent name: | Röhm GmbH | ||||||||
Board: | 3.2.02 | ||||||||
Headnote: | The Opposition Division should assume the prima facie validity of dependent claims which have not been objected to by the Opponent at any stage. The Opposition Division has no reason to doubt the validity of the examination of undisputed claims before grant unless specific circumstances have emerged in consequence of evident technical facts not to be neglected or submissions in the proceedings (following T 182/89, OJ EPO 1991, 391). | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Inventive step (yes) Argumentation ex post Opposition procedure Examination of claims not objected to by the Opponent Power and obligation of the Opposition Division Reimbursement of Appeal fees (yes) |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t880293ex1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
12 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)