European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1990:T020888.19900228 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 28 February 1990 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0208/88 | ||||||||
Application number: | 80106574.9 | ||||||||
IPC class: | A01N 43/54 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
Distribution: | |||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | - | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Bayer | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.3.01 | ||||||||
Headnote: | An effect (in this case, growth regulation) not previously described, but actually occurring during the execution of a known teaching (in this case, use as a fungicide) and intended as the basis of a use invention, has at any event not been made available to the public (thereby anticipating the use invention) if it is not revealed so clearly during such execution as to disclose the invention's essential character, at least potentially, to an unlimited number of skilled persons (point 3.1 of the Reasons for the Decision) (cf. G 6/88, OJ EPO 1990, 114). | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Novelty of second non-medical use with same technical means of execution Reimbursement of appeal fee (no) |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t880208du1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
11 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)