T 0077/87 (Erroneous abstract) of 16.3.1989

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1989:T007787.19890316
Date of decision: 16 March 1989
Case number: T 0077/87
Application number: 80303804.1
IPC class: C08F 214/08
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: A
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 1 MB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: OJ | Published
Title of application: -
Applicant name: ICI PLC
Opponent name: Hüls
Board: 3.3.01
Headnote: 1. When it is clear from related contemporaneously available evidence that the literal disclosure of a document is erroneous and does not represent the intended technical results, such an erroneous disclosure should not be considered as part of the state of the art under Article 54 EPC.
2. When a published abstract contains a cross-reference to its original document which is contemporaneously available, and the literal disclosure of the abstract is inconsistent with the disclosure of the original document, the abstract should be interpreted by reference to the original document for the purpose of ascertaining the technical reality of what has been disclosed. If it is then clear that the disclosure in the abstract is erroneous, such erroneous disclosure should not be considered as part of the state of the art.
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 54
Keywords: Erroneous abstract
Novelty (yes)
Erroneous disclosure not regarded as novelty-destroying
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
-
Citing decisions:
T 0453/87
T 0539/88
T 0591/90
T 0123/91
T 0412/91
T 0029/92
T 0160/92
T 0255/93
T 0889/93
T 0219/94
T 0243/96
T 1088/96
T 0015/97
T 1009/97
T 0161/98
T 0219/98
T 1080/99
T 0230/01
T 0892/01
T 1192/02
T 1193/03
T 1201/03
T 0287/06
T 0606/06
T 0382/07
T 0814/08

18 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPO Guidelines - B Search

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: I Patentability

General Case Law