European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1988:T031786.19880415 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 15 April 1988 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0317/86 | ||||||||
Application number: | 81305677.7 | ||||||||
IPC class: | B03C 3/68 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | A | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | - | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Smidth | ||||||||
Opponent name: | Metallgesellschaft Siemens |
||||||||
Board: | 3.2.01 | ||||||||
Headnote: | If the particulars available to the EPO are together sufficient to identify the patent easily and beyond doubt, no deficiency within the meaning of Rule 56(2) EPC exists with regard to the title of the patent being contested by means of an opposition. Either of the numbers (publication number or application number) will normally suffice, provided that all the other particulars given with the notice of opposition together with the file establish beyond all doubt that the patent is the one intended. | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Notice of opposition - requirements Necessity of mentioning title of invention |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t860317ex1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
4 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)