| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1986:T016384.19860821 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 21 August 1986 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0163/84 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 80100882.2 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | - | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
| Distribution: | |||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | BAYER | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.02 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | A new chemical intermediate product is not inventive merely because it is prepared in the course of an inventive multi-stage process and is further processed to a known end product. Such a product is however at any rate patentable when its further processing is inventive. (Further to "Bis-epoxy ethers/BASF", T22/82, OJ EPO 9/1982, p. 341). | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Inventive step Intermediate products for known end products Multi-stage process Part-process Patentability Protection of elements |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t840163ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
6 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)
