| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2011:T105709.20111025 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 25 October 2011 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1057/09 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 96303905.2 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | A01N 43/80 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Avoidance of precipitation in 3-isothiazolone formulations | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Thor GmbH | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Main request and auxiliary request 1 - clarity (no) - wording of claim 9 ambiguous Auxiliary request 2 - novelty (yes) Alleged prior use - (no) - No clear and unambiguously determination of the information disclosed during the oral presentation of the thesis. Special relationship between the student and the staff of the sponsoring chemical company - No proof that confidentiality was breached - Thesis was not displayed on the library shelves of the "Fachhochschule" Inventive step (yes) - deterrent prior art |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t091057eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021