Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).

T 1391/07 () of 7.11.2008

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2008:T139107.20081107

Date of decision:

07 November 2008

Case number:

T 1391/07

Application number:

IPC class:

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

C

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 42Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

Thermal-type air flow measuring instrument

Applicant name:

Hitachi, Ltd., et al

Opponent name:

-

Board:

3.4.02

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

Guidelines for examination in the EPO C-VI, 9.1(6)
Guidelines for examination in the EPO C-IV, 6(4)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 76(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 67

Keywords:

Divisional application - "double-patenting" (no)
Reimbursement of appeal fee (no)

Catchwords:

"see points 2.5, 2.6 and 4"

Cited decisions:

G 0001/05
G 0001/06
T 0058/86
T 0118/91
T 0399/96
T 0080/98
T 0587/98
T 0500/00
T 0475/02
T 0411/03
T 0425/03
T 0467/03
T 0468/03
T 0579/05

Citing decisions:

T 0877/06
T 1491/06
T 2402/10
T 2461/10
T 0649/11
T 1483/11
T 2563/11
T 0879/12
T 1780/12
T 0318/14
T 0621/15

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t071391eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

20 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Offical Journal of the EPO

X OJ EPO 2020, A104 - Interlocutory Decision of Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.01 dated 7 February 2019 - T 318/14

X OJ EPO SE 4/2015, p19 - PART II

X OJ EPO SE 2/2015, p11 - I. PATENTABILITY

Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application

X CLR II F 5 Double patenting

X CLR II F 5.2 Different subject-matter and scope of protection; overlapping subject-matter

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

X G 0001/05 (Exclusion and objection/XXX) of 7.12.2006

X G 0001/06 (Sequences of divisionals/SEIKO) of 28.6.2007

General Case Law

X T 0118/91 () of 28.7.1992

X T 0080/98 () of 26.9.2000

X T 0587/98 (Divisional claim conflicting with parent) of 12.5.2000

X T 0500/00 () of 17.6.2004

X T 0475/02 () of 21.12.2006

X T 0877/06 (Filter Element/DONALDSON COMP) of 2.12.2009

X T 1491/06 () of 20.12.2011

X T 2402/10 (Prostaglandin derivatives / Pfizer) of 10.5.2012

X T 2461/10 (MAT-MolekÃ¼le/BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM VETMEDICA) of 26.3.2014

X T 2563/11 (Doppelpatentierung) of 5.9.2017

X T 0879/12 (APO-2 ligand/GENENTECH) of 27.8.2014

X T 1780/12 (Cancer treatment/BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM) of 30.1.2014

X T 0621/15 () of 14.9.2018