European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2006:T042403.20060223 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 23 February 2006 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0424/03 | ||||||||
Application number: | 95119547.8 | ||||||||
IPC class: | G06F 9/46 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | B | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | Data transfer with expanded clipboard formats | ||||||||
Applicant name: | MICROSOFT CORPORATION | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.5.01 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
Keywords: | Late-filed request responding to objections - admitted (yes) Method of operating a computer - excluded as being a computer program (no) Novelty/inventive step (yes) |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
1. The claim category of a computer-implemented method is distinguished from that of a computer program. Even though a method, in particular a method of operating a computer, may be put into practice with the help of a computer program, a claim relating to such a method does not claim a computer program in the category of a computer program (point 5.1 of the reasons). 2. A computer-readable medium is a technical product and, thus, has technical character (point 5.3 of the reasons). |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t030424eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
27 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPO Guidelines - F The European Patent Application
XGL F IV 3.9.1 Cases where all method steps can be fully implemented by generic data processing means
EPO Guidelines - G Patentability
Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO 2019, A86 - Interlocutory decision of Technical Board of Appeal 3.5.07 dated 22 February 2019 - T 489/14