| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2005:T042003.20050510 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 10 May 2005 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0420/03 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 94901058.1 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | A01K 1/12 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | A construction for automatically milking animals | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | MAASLAND N.V. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | DeLaval International AB Westfalia Landtechnik GmbH Prolion B.V. |
||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.04 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Additional decision of the opposition division regarding apportionment of costs Appellant's request for cancellation of the apportionment of costs neither filed within the two-month appeal period nor covered by the extent of the appeal specified in the notice of appeal (inadmissible) Clarity of the amendments Admissibility of the amendments under Article 123 EPC Remittal to the department of the first instance for consideration of the undecided issues |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
"The extent of the appeal within the meaning of Rule 64(b) EPC must be clear from the notice of appeal. The statement setting out the grounds of appeal cannot in principle be used to complete, or amend, the extent of the appeal defined in the notice of appeal, if this statement is not filed within the two-month appeal period." |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t030420eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021